Wii U's surprising E3 heroes

Written by James

Ad

As just about every major disaster comes and goes, a single question tends to percolate to the brim of public consciousness: how soon is too soon? That is to say, how far in time must we be distanced from an event until we can analyze it with some sense of objectivity and without the immediate sense of horror or disappointment?

Speaking of disasters, Nintendo's tragic "loss" of E3 2012 may not have warranted space on the front pages of the world's major broadsheets, but within the fishbowl world of Nintendo and its eager dependants, this single event might almost be considered Nintendo's very own Dunkirk. Maybe it's finally time to re-visit E3 2012 for just a moment, now that the collective grief has eased.

Inline Image

Sure, we didn't quite get the impressive showcase that Nintendo pulled out of their proverbial hat at E3 2006 for the Wii, where we caught glimpses of everything from Super Mario Galaxy and Metroid Prime 3: Corruption to Wii Sports and Wario Ware: Smooth Moves (Nintendo really seemed intend to satisfy the full spectrum of gamers at that show). Despite such comparisons, there were still numerous genuinely impressive and unique titles on display for Wii U at E3 2012.

And when I think about my most-anticipated games of the next year or so (across all platforms), I can safely say that several of these find their home on Wii U. I won't bore you with all the ins-and-outs of these games—no doubt you have already seen some great hands-on impressions and previews elsewhere—but I think it is worth stepping away from the "OMG no Zelda?!" stuff for a just a moment, in order to give these games a little breathing room of their own.

Inline Image

There were a couple of Wii U titles on display at E3 that immediately made me sit up and take notice. For me, Platinum Games' seductively ridiculous (ridiculously seductive?) Project P-100 is right at the top of my "must have" list. Although this Viewtiful Joe meets Pikmin experiment looks to contain some mildly unwieldy elements (such as drawing on the GamePad screen to guide your group of heroes into a given formation), I can't help but be excited about the game's potential. I think it looks gorgeous, for one thing, both in terms of the actual art style and also the animation. Go and check out the videos that show the city crumbling around the heroes; the dozens of buildings on screen helplessly writhe against each other as the highway shatters and disintegrates beneath the protagonists' feet. Simply beautiful.

This is also one of those games that is clearly not simply being ported over to the Wii U, in the sense that it actually makes use of the GamePad in ways that don't seem to be token additions. Moving your heroes into a building, for example, pushes the game action onto the GamePad screen where you get an over-the-shoulder view of the action (while the city itself is still displayed on your TV). Synchronizing your actions on the GamePad with actions on the TV (for example, turning a crank inside a warehouse, and being able to watch the results unfold on the TV) is hopefully one of many ways in which the GamePad will genuinely enhance Project P-100's game play.

Inline Image

Probably the most widely-covered Wii U title, at least as far as third-party efforts go, would have to be Ubisoft's ZombiU. Setting aside the terrible name for just a moment, I think that this game goes a long way in terms of actually validating Nintendo's concept with Wii U. It's fine to show off "asymmetrical game play," of the sort to which titles like Nintendo Land adhere, but I think that ZombiU effortlessly demonstrates one way in which the Wii U can provide a genuinely compelling experience for the so-called "hardcore" crowd. My favorite aspect of this title is the way the GamePad is used: the above screenshot beautifully illustrates the way that the player can perform an action on the GamePad's screen, while the surrounding action is still "live" on the TV. You can imagine how, in a real-life situation, you would not be able to pause the world around you just so you could open a safe or rifle through someone's pockets to search for a valuable item. In ZombiU—as in a real world situation—you have to pay attention to the task at hand while also remaining vigilant as to your surroundings. I can imagine this idea working incredibly well and providing plenty of scares, and it's an idea that could find application across multiple genres in the future. If ZombiU lives up to its potential, it could easily become Wii U's very own Left 4 Dead-style hit. Let's keep our fingers crossed.

At this juncture I should probably say that I am actually quite interested in Nintendo's own offerings: Pikmin 3 not only looks gorgeous, but more Pikmin is always a good thing as far as I'm concerned. And then there's, you know, "the other stuff": Nintendo Land, Wii Fit U, and Game & Wario. As dismissive as I might first appear, I am actually greatly looking forward to all three of these titles (albeit due to their value as entertaining curiosities rather than real meat 'n' potatoes stuff). The reason I throw these titles in as an afterthought is both because they were heavily promoted by Nintendo at E3 and also because Nintendo's own content tends to be a sure bet anyway.

I could go on, of course: Aliens: Colonial Marines, Rayman Legends, and Tank! Tank! Tank! all deserve attention in my view. Colonial Marines has captured my attention in particular, in part because it is a direct continuation of the Aliens narrative, and in part because the GamePad doubles as the incredibly famous sonar device from the films (I'm perfectly happy to admit that I may be able to overlook just a few of the game's potential shortcomings as a result of this one awesome feature).

Now that the dust has settled, can we still say that this year's E3 was a disaster for Nintendo? Well, I am not willing to be too revisionist on this point, but I genuinely wonder if the painful collision of inflated fan expectation and cold, hard realism has allowed some truly interesting concepts to slip off the proverbial radar. On reflection, I am actually pretty excited about some of Wii U's E3 2012 offerings. Fortunately, we don't have to wait very long to see if these games live up to their promise.

Discussion (oldest first)

+ Leave a comment
  1. marijuanamerle
     said |

    I was at E3.

    "Now that the dust has settled, can we still say that this year's E3 was a disaster for Nintendo?"

    Why don't you ask Nintendo that question. I asked a good number of Nintendo reps on the showroom floor what they thought about attendees reactions to their console. I got the same reflective bs responses and when I asked for specs, price and real release date they divulged even less. What really worried me was the fact that Nintendo intends to release the U this year. Months away from launch and Nintendo is tight lipped? Maybe the reaction at E3 resonated a little more than people think.

    Now that some time has passed and the company's profits showing in the red are public, will Nintendo finally give it to us straight. Will this effect pricing or release date? One thing was apparent at E3, the incredible games which will be available for the 360 and PS3. When games like watchdogs, the last of us and halo 4(just to name a few) look more impressive than what a brand new "next gen" system has to offer, it's no wonder Nintendo is facing an uphill battle for our interest in its new console. I, like the majority of attendees at the expo were not very excited with the U. That's just the plain truth and in my opinion the reason Nintendo is so coy on releasing any definitive information regarding their new console
    . If they're waiting for us to forget E3 before releasing more info, we may have a long wait ahead of us. Hopefully, we'll know more in September after the shareholders meeting.
    1. Kevin K.
       said to marijuanamerle |

      You realize that Nintendo doesn't reveal a console's price and release date at E3 anymore, right? That has been the case since it first revealed the Wii. It has nothing to do with everyone's supposed reaction to the console (I was at the show, too, so I can safely say that what you're claiming is not representative of the general attendee consensus of the system).
    2. JamesJamesauthor
       said to marijuanamerle |

      I do not mean to suggest that Nintendo's E3 showing was not a disappointment - it clearly was, and for many people at that.

      My point was that sometimes, as fans, we become so absurdly hostile and we engage in so much hand-wringing that the genuinely good stuff slips through the cracks. Sure, nobody would argue that Wii U couldn't have had a better E3 showing. But does that mean there was nothing of value at the show for Wii U? Absolutely not.

      Sometimes it is useful and instructive to step back - often well after the event - and carefully consider what real value was actually present. I was somewhat disappointed that games like Project P-100, while certainly covered by many outlets, ultimately did not receive the kind of front-page attention it deserved.

      Nintendo's competitors did not fare much better at E3, even though there were a couple of diamonds in the rough. And as for info - well, clearly, we will see price and release date information before the end of the year. So I am not too worried about those details, personally.

      My biggest disappointment, in general, is when clever ideas and interesting games are ignored or not adequately recognized/investigated due to the frantic politics surrounding such an event.
  2. stinkystinky
     said |

    I always thought this Nintendo E3 "disaster" was total bullshit.

    I wasn't there, but I watched it online. Was it the greatest thing I've ever seen? No, not really. I feel like people who slammed Nintendo over it are just gonna dull, unimaginative people. I mean after all, isn't an expo presentation kinda nothing more than a 60 minute powerpoint presentation? I got to see the hardware, I got to see clips of the games. What the hell else did you want? The equivalent of a "Triumph of the Will" spectacle?? 3D laser light show? Popcorn and soda?? A back massage?? I feel like a lot of it has to do with a serious lack of imagination in this slavering, slobbering gamer nerd fans. Give me a break.

    Nintendo came in and showed off some shit. Queue 6 months of complaining. Guess what? When it drops in November, all the people who were complaining are gonna go out and buy it, and then will proceed to SHUT THE F%*$& UP when they see how cool it is.

    Good day!
    1. OGgamer
       said to stinkystinky |

      I like how these fanboys always defend Nintendo even though they've never seen or played the U in person. And why cuss? Do you not have anything intelligent to say? if anything, fanboys are are dull and unimaginative. The majority of all responses are the same from you people.

      Why do you feel compelled to knock someone's opinion who has actual hands on experience with a console you've never tried out yourself. Don't be so ignorant and stop telling people who don't agree with you to keep quiet. I'm sure the majority of unbiased gamers would wish fanboys of any console would keep uninspired ignorant comments to themselves, but I would never insist you, how did you put it "SHUT THE F%*$& UP". Post what you will, just don't expect anyone to respect what you have to say.
    2. stinkystinky
       said to OGgamer |

      "I like how these fanboys always defend Nintendo even though they've never seen or played the U in person." - Dumb comment - don't really need to. It's clear from gameplay videos how it works you Hungarian ass-clown.

      "And why cuss?" - It's fun.

      "Do you not have anything intelligent to say?" - see original post you hiney-ticklin', spit-shinin' mongoose turd.

      "Why do you feel compelled to knock someone's opinion who has actual hands on experience with a console you've never tried out yourself." - As I said this meme of the "infamous Nintendo E3 failure" is total hot air.

      Good day!
    3. Reality
       said to stinkystinky |

      With a name like stinkystinky and your posts about hungarian ass clowns, ass play and spit shining', sound like you need a man in your life. Log on to males meeting males sites if you want to meet someone and leave these forums to people who want to discuss the subjects at hand.

      I hope you figure out how to open that closet door and find happiness...and lube.

      Good day, sir.
  3. uTitta
     said |

    I just wish that Nintendo would realize that consumers don't want "new", we want "better"! I mean, if they could have made it an additional controller instead of an entire new system... thy might have had something going, you know? Anyway... I feel that it's something to be experienced before anyone makes a personal conclusion. Additionally, I would like to know if the WiiU will actually support HDMI so if anyone could let me know, I'd be greatly obliged.
    1. TathanenTathanenstaff
       said to uTitta |

      Yep, there's a standard HDMI port right on the back.
    2. JoesatMarios
       said to uTitta |

      Dude, there are consumers who like new instead of bettr. I mean nowdays there is little technology wise that can be improve. PS4 and Xbox 720/8 (whatever you wanna call it) are probably going to be pretty much the same exact same consoles as the previous generations' consoles, and if there is a difference, it most probably will cause it to sell at a major loss (which probably is not going to be recovered by first party games, since they don't have many of those) ,or it will not be noticeable. And in case you havent noticed, the Wii U has all the buttons of a regular gaming controller, except it also has a touchscreen, which is, in some people's opinion, an "improvement" . The Wii U will also have the Wii U Pro Controller, which is similar to ps3/Xbox controllers, and the Classic Controller Pro (in case you don't want the analogue sticks on the top). So in a way, this console is not only "new", but it is also "better".
  4. Funkynugget
     said |

    My opinion on Nintendo's E3 this year was mere disappointment in a sense, only really because of looking back at past E3's pre-console launch, with Wii we got to see a variety of different games and trailers and it was awesome, albeit some of those games didn't come out to 1-3 years after that. The way I sort of view this E3, yes we didn't get Zelda or Metroid, or even a trailer for the next Smash Bros, but what we did get was trailers and also gameplay footage of games for the Wii U that will all be out before next E3. Yes they coulda easily just showed us a Zelda trailer but then we are waiting years for it. I think they just wanted to focus on stuff that will be out alongside the Wii U launch and the months following, then concentrate on other games in development and showcasing them at next E3 rather than having us wait years after showing it.
  5. tekkentag2:D
     said |

    I don't really understand why people are so rude on comments... why are we calling eachother things like dull, unimaginative, and unintelligent? (this was only two people though) and OGgamer said don't cuss but then wrote the exact phrase that angered them in first place. :( I just wish people wouldn't get so worked up over video games. I don't have a problem with people writing there opinions on the system its when people get so angry that they do things like start cussing after they down talked it. Everybody is titled to their own opinion but I have always been a fan of Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo. I think that each has first party and third party games that are great. So when the Wii U comes out i don't really mind if the specs and stuff aren't as good. I am buying it for the games. (and I know that sounds very fanboy of Nintendo but its true! :) ) I will also buy other systems, not depending on the specs but the games. (that is, if I have the money!)
    1. TathanenTathanenstaff
       said to tekkentag2:D |

      I feel you buddy. A little respect goes a long way.
    2. marijuanamerle
       said to tekkentag2:D |

      To be fair, oggamer quoted stinky and you took it out of context.

      The problem with people like yourself who buy things based on the fact that they're new is the reason companies don't try harder to give us the most for our money. They think there's enough people like yourself who will buy a console at launch just because. Then there are the people who only own a wii or Nintendo products who are just upgrading (in Nintendo's case from the wii)

      Nintendo, for the first time ever is releasing a next gen system first and what they are offering (especially at launch) i'm sorry to say is nothing better than what the competion is currently offering. I expected much more and you should too. I'm sorry this may hurt your felling, but for you to be content with what Nintendo is offering and for people like joesatmarios to think a little better than what 6 and 7 year old consoles is what were going to get is absolutely insane. Are you really interested in buying a new system regardless of who manufactures it if it is only a little better than what is currently on the market?

      I personally want the next leveI in photorealistic graphics and AI. I want a better level if online gaming. And most of all, I expect Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony to compete ferociously for my business. This will not only bring out the best in them, but will provide us with the true next level in console gaming.
  6. Firearrow
     said |

    Bottom line. Nintendo corners the market on selling games to kids and the people who get nostalgic playing their games. (Me being one of them) In addition, when you employee as many as Nintendo does, you have to do something to make money, especially when you are losing it.
    1. Doubledash
       said to Firearrow |

      Not this time I'm afraid. Without a gimmick that a casual audience can get behind, Nintendo is forced more than ever to depend on 3rd party developers and right now, it's not looking too impressive (especially if they're only offering HD rehash i.e. 2d Mario game). If all that 3rd party companies can provide is last year's games and multiplatform ports at or near launch, what reason does a PS3 and 360 owner have to buy another system?

      Sorry, I'm still pissed they didn't think to launch with Mario Galaxy 3.
    2. LobdaleLobdalestaff
       said to Firearrow |

      Nintendo might have the "kids and nostalgia" market cornered but you also fail to mention that Nintendo just plain are better game makers than any other company. They practically pioneered the modern age of console gaming on the foundation that every game they released was a good game, with the graphics you would see in the game right there on the front of the box (in the US anyway), as an effort to remove the uncertainty of buying potential misrepresented Atari garbage.

      Even without third parties, Nintendo will always make Nintendo games. Say what you will about being a gamer, about playing games from other developers, about enjoying games in general. But people who like Nintendo for Nintendo games have plenty to be confident when it comes to the Wii U and what it offers Nintendo to make Nintendo games. Anyone who can recognize a well-crafted game can recognize the craft and the quality in their titles.

      What reason as a PS3/360 gamer would I have to buy another system? Easy question--you can only play Nintendo games on Nintendo systems. And I don't think you have to be a kid or a fanboy to enjoy playing a Nintendo game.
  7. Pete
     said |

    I think the main reason people were disappointed was that there was a lot of confusion and scepticism around the Wii U going into E3, and this "blow out" at E3 really didn't do much to stem a lot of "knocks" people were pinning against the Wii U going in such as --

    1.) Nintendo's games are just Wii + -- NSMB U, Pikmin 3, Nintendo Land, Wii Fit U, etc. may be fun, but they certainly did not look like something from a new generation, they looked like Wii games running 720p with a few extra effects thrown in. Nothing surprising aesthetically or gameplay wise here at all. It almost felt "paint by the numbers".

    2.) Third party support would be a bunch of PS3/360 left overs -- Hard to argue this when most third parties seemed MIA during the Nintendo conference and Nintendo for whatever reason decides to spend 10+ minutes talking about a port of Batman Arkham City. No really exciting new third party announcements whatsoever (Zombi U was already shown as Killer Freaks last year).

    3.) The Wii U tablet a revolution or not? -- They showed a few mildly interesting uses of the Wii U tablet, but nothing to really suggest it radically alters the game play experience that much. It's no Wiimote.

    4.) The Wii U Is Just A 360/PS3 Hardware Wise -- Again nothing to dispel this notion either, in fact the game's Nintendo showed looked considerably behind what Sony and MS were showing on their 7+ year old machines (ie: Last of Us, Halo 4, etc.).

    I think all that left a sour taste in people's mouths on top of the obvious things (no Retro project, no EAD Tokyo, inexplicably not having P-100 during the conference itself).

    The console will be fun and I'll be buy one anyway because I'm sure Nintendo will make fun games for it. And really these days that's about as much time as I have to play video games. The third party portion of it was a bit disheartening though I have to admit.
    1. Getreal
       said to Pete |

      So after all that, you still want to buy one at launch? Will the price have any effect on your decision? Will you buy a piece of cardboard if it's able to play a Mario game in HD?
    2. Pete
       said to Getreal |

      Unless I can get Mario, Mario Kart, DKC, Zelda, Metroid, Star Fox, Smash Bros., Kid Icarus, F-Zero, Pikmin, Fire Emblem, etc. somewhere else, then sure I'm going to have to buy a Wii U.

      I don't need an E3 showing to sell me on a console.

      Nintendo is still my favourite game publisher by a country mile even if I don't like all or even many of their hardware decisions. Probably of my 10 favourite franchises, 7 or 8 are Nintendo IP.
    3. donkeypunch
       said to Pete |

      Only 2 of the IPs you named are going to be available around launch. To assume all the other ones will be produced for the system is bit premature. I don't even know if a hard drive is even an option. I know Nintendo's online offerings have been crap so that's another thing I need more info on before I make a decision. Do you usually buy things before you know what they consists of? From the looks of it, no.

      I own all 3 current consoles, so I think I'll wait to buy a new one, at least until there's a game and or options available that make it worth buying. Especially if the price is too high and that goes for any system.
    4. Pete
       said to donkeypunch |

      That's fine but NSMB U will keep me busy for a while. I didn't play through Arkham City yet either so I might pick that up as well. I'm guessing Nintendo Land probably will be bundled in the West, and even though I'm not that crazy about mini-game compilations, if it's in the box, I'll give it a shot. If the reviews are alright I will consider Zombi U.

      For me waiting 8-18 months for a $50 price drop isn't really a big deal (again though this is just my personal situation).

      I know the other Nintendo IP will be there so it's not like a big surprise any more when Nintendo announces a new Zelda, Mario, whatever. I've owned every Nintendo console on from the original NES, so this ain't my first rodeo.
    5. gmangraves
       said to Pete |

      The U version of Mario wasn't too exciting. I was more impressed by the exclusive Rayman game. I also started thinking about haw stale the Mario games are getting. Has anyone noticed how unoriginal the last 2 versions are?

      Before the wii, no Mario game has used the same graphics style since the original SMB2(lost levels) for a sequel. Mario galaxy 2 is very similar to galaxy 1. And now NSMBU Is doing the same, not in 720p.(and both of those originated on the DS) This is not intended as a knock on their quality, just an observation. I will say, I did get that feeling of "I've played this already" when trying out NSMBU.

      I feel Nintendo is rushing the system out to the market to make up for this year's losses. Between the stagnant sales of the wii over the last year and production costs for the 3DS, Nintendo seems desperate to make make up for it with the U. This would explain why the majority of titles anounced are multiplatform ports.

      People I know who are going to wait on the U are not doing so for a price drop. They are waiting for games, or at least one that will make the purchase worth while.
    6. gmangraves
       said to gmangraves |

      Typo

      Should say but instead of not for

      And now NSMBU Is doing the same, not in 720p.

      Sorry

Leave a comment: